A Case For Nationalism
against third-worldists and other right-wing spergs
For those of you who do not know much about Patriot Front, please see this earlier article I wrote:
Patriot Front is the Future
America is moving towards a new era. Things are fast changing in the Western world and the dynamics have turned in our favor in some important ways. First and foremost would be the open debate that is occurring concerning nationalism, globalism, immigration, and ethnic identity. For the first time in my entire life, I am finding it increasingly easier t…
A couple months back, TheRightToDissent wrote a well-written but factually incorrect article called “The Patriotard Delusion” about how Patriot Front is “slop nationalism”. This guys follows me, and yet he blocked me for 1000 years from commenting on his article. He also blocked An American Writer & Essayist who is an incredibly calm and easy guy to disagree with. Not only is this incredibly gay and cowardly, but it really goes to show the problem with many of the detractors of Patriot Front — none of them want to engage with their ideological opponents on this matter without falling into third-worldism or utter anti-American spergery. This is something I’ve noticed across the board, whether it be a normal GOP conservative, some bona fide National Socialist, liberal extremist, or even the King of the Groypers, Nick Fuentes. For some reason, people who hate Patriot Front have no interest in changing their views, and it is important for those of us who are willing to engage with patriotic ideas to understand where they are coming from, and how we can disarm them.
Before I get into the above linked article, I want to address some common complaints by people who don’t like Patriot Front. These range from normie takes to some better critiques.
Aren’t they just petty nationalists?
This is the most interesting critique I sometimes hear. Petty nationalism is in reference to the type of nationalism that we have experienced since time immemorial. It is in reference to the nationalism of the Germans, Greeks, Scots, Irish, and many others, where the members of a nation puts their nation over all others and is willing to fight even brother nations to secure their dominance. We see this in the British Isles quite often, with Scots, Northern Irish, Welsh, and even some Cornish and English nationalists seeking to dismantle the British Union in favor of a more unabashed version of ethno-nationalism. We see this historically with the fall of the Roman or Holy Roman Empires, wherein many constituent and conquered states break away to engage in centuries long warfare with each other over the ruins of the empire. This is usually compared then to the National Socialists, who were ultra-nationalists, and somehow also White internationalists who sought to unite all White people into one ultra-nation. The problem here is that Patriot Front are simply nationalists, and they work with nationalists in other European nations. Thomas Sewell of Australia has praised PF, Rob Rundo who is closely allied with PF is a known actvist for European active clubs, and some other smaller nationalist organizations from Europe have close friendships with PF — and this should show that Patriot Front doesn’t seek to return to a violent competition between Europeans.
Why do they march?
Patriot Front leaders and members are often banned from social media. Any time they try to make an organizationally run account, the account gets banned. Even friendly podcasts, such as FroJax, had their account nuked from X in the middle of a recent livestream with Thomas Rousseau. So, how does a pro-White, nationalistic, and identarian organization get around these bans? Marches. It is a tactic called spectacle politics, and it works. Patriot Front recently held the largest nationalist march this country has seen in decades, and they did it in D.C. of all places. It was orderly, well-planned, and received viral support. The organization has gotten over 2k applications after their event. FYI, they do these marches to build organizational integrity, comradery between the men, and most importantly to get their message out of containment. People who complain about their marches tend to be spergs.
Why do they wear masks?
Anonymity is a right enshrined in the founding of America, and we have many laws protecting our identity. The Founding Fathers wrote anonymous revolutionary documents, the Boston Tea Party was done in costume to hide identities, and even the famous Regulators wore masks or blackened their faces for public demonstrations and for guerrilla action. Anonymity is an American right that techno-globalists seek to dismantle through their surveillance networks powered by AI and the new Flock cameras. Furthermore, we all know that practicing op-sec online is important. Most of you write and comment under pseudonyms. This is normal, healthy, and protective behavior. It defends against liberal and Zionist doxxing, and allows for dissidents to spread their views more easily, and without the stress of having your personal life damaged. I genuinely wish that we could one day go “mask off” but that day has not yet come.
Aren’t they feds?
This is a common normie take, but you also find it with conspiratorial terminally online users. The fact that they get banned from places such as X and Youtube should make it obvious that they are not feds, but let’s just examine this claim for a moment. Feds have infiltrated many organizations in the past, and their main purpose of doing so is information gathering. The other thing they do is strategic control, where they push the strategy of the leaders away from things which work towards things that can get members jailed. A great example of this happening would be the militias (such as the Base) which were coerced into breaking the law without a clear purpose as to why they were doing so. A rogue militia or extremist militant group that seeks to kill or assassinate enemies sounds like a good idea to many revolutionaries, but when these things get attempted, there is no over-arching plan for revolution. Killing your local jewish reporter or kidnapping your governor isn’t going to change anything unless groups across the nation are united in a common revolutionary cause. Why would Mossad, or the American federal agencies, waste their time with an organization that strictly bans all weapons training and focuses more on community building and White advocacy? Patriot Front is not able to be coerced into breaking federal law, therefore, feds can only watch and seethe.
What do they even accomplish?
They have organized hundreds of men to a common cause, instilling noble virtues and the value of comradery and hierarchical organization. They have established countless active clubs. They assist with disaster relief. They assist with local political campaigns. They influence heritage and anti-immigration orgs. They help give young White men a purpose in this dark anti-White world. These things should be enough for anyone to support them, even if you dislike some of their tactics or views.
Problems With “The Patriotard Delusion”
It is a well-written article, I must give credit where it is due. However, the author gets many things wrong and clearly doesn’t actually know what Patriot Front does or believes. This could be forgiven because the media does hamper their message, and most people will not do their due diligence and learn more about their actions and beliefs. Still, it behooves anyone who is seeking to denigrate Patriot Front to actually understand what Patriot Front does before they go about denigrating them. Here are some erroneous claims from the article, with my rebuttals:
Patriot Front doesn’t outline their enemies.
Thus, in order to do politics one must first define a political enemy against whom to fight in order to advance the interests of one’s political in-group. No enemy, no politics.
Patriot Front is a White identarian, nationalist, and heritage organization. It should be obvious to anyone who their enemies are, but let’s just address this one. In many podcast interviews, Thomas goes into the globalist bankers of Israel, the Zionists in power, the conservatives who back this power up, and the liberals who were created by this power to dismantle our nations. Patriot Front is anti-immigration, anti-foreign lobbies, and anti-foreign wars. Their enemies are Mexican cartels, Chinese moguls, leftist agitators, conservative Zionists, and the Israeli-lobby that seeks to make America into a melting pot for the whole world. This is obvious to anyone who listens to their speeches or knows their members. They are nationalists, therefore the enemies are those who are opposed to the American nation and people. This includes both foreign powers, and domestic ones.
Patriot Front doesn’t want to partake in politics.
Oddly, Patriot Front — an organisation clearly seeking some form of political change in America — claims it isn’t actually doing politics after all.
The manifesto says that politics will not save us, not that they aren’t actually doing politics. Patriot Front has involved itself in local campaigns across the country, canvassing and supporting local anti-immigration politicians. They have members who are embedded in lower levels of the Republican Party, and members who have cemented themselves in the Young Republicans, and I assume they have members involved with other organizations because they have influence over various heritage and anti-immigration organizations across the country. Their goal isn’t to become a political party, but to influence those parties and organizations through advocacy and activism. It works, by the way. However, this isn’t going to be broadcasted because it hampers the influence that they have acquired through careful labor and planning.
Patriot Front doesn’t outline who is an American well enough.
The status of other White Americans whose ancestors came to the US after its founding is uncertain.
This part is especially annoying. The author is basically trying to say that since Patriot Front affirms the Founding Stock Heritage Americans along with the ethnogenesis of the American nation, then they are leaving out later immigrant populations from Europe. This is ridiculous. There are members in Patriot Front who are recent immigrants from Europe themselves. Many members are either directly or indirectly connected to immigrant European populations. Patriot Front affirms the national identity of Americans, and that includes later immigrant Europeans.
Patriot Front ignores that blacks are also Americans.
Sitting next to the giant Jewish elephant in Patriot Front’s Americana-bedecked room is a slightly less giant but still dangerous Black elephant. For all the problems that American Blacks present, it is difficult to argue against their status as heritage Americans.
It’s really easy to argue against their status as Heritage Americans. The answer is simply: America is a nation of Europeans, and since blacks aren’t Europeans, they cannot become Americans. It is that simple. The Founding Fathers all affirmed this, and so too do many other prominent politicians and thinkers in American history. The very idea that blacks, or other non-Whites, can become Americans is a jewish idea that nationalists have been opposing in this nation for centuries now. I go into the Founder’s views at the end of this article1.
Patriot Front doesn’t want mass deportations or remigration.
Those hoping for mass deportations are left disappointed. Patriot Front’s vision for the new America is in essence the old America but administered by a Platonic elite class of virtuous guardians who have traced their genetic lineage back to the founding stock. In this ambitious vision, the novi homines of America — paragons of pioneer spirit — might still get killed by an Indian truck driver or have their throats cut by a schizophrenic Black on the subway. The spirit of America might have changed but not the potential for random violence.
The part of the manifesto that the author quoted before saying this was not talking about the goals of Patriot Front, but instead the current situation. Blacks and other non-Whites may have citizenship status, and might even be good citizens, but they are not and can never be Americans. Patriot Front supports total remigration, mass deportations, and denaturalization of all foreigners, no matter when they were brought here. This part by the author was incredibly duplicitous.
Patriot Front clings to dead ideas.
If the promises of “an era of rebirth” and “the beginning of a new chapter” are to be realised then what is required is a novel and clearly articulated vision for the future which captures the collective imagination. This is one of the reasons why the Jewish rebranding of America as a nation of immigrants eventually won the day.
If this is the case, then Europe should likewise throw away all of her past symbols and myths, because the same arguments used against Americans are now working on Europeans. However, when nationalists gathered at Charlottesville to protest the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee, a failed general from a failed war of independence, we saw Americans of many backgrounds and walks of life to gather in an ill-fated attempt to defend a piece of American history. That American history was attacked because it represented European civilization and White pride. During the BLM riots, statues of Americans from all sides of the political aisle were torn down and desecrated, and they were attacked because they were representative of White people. The symbols and myths of America aren’t worthless and dead, but they are under attack. Similarly, European myths and symbols are being attacked — should English nationalists drop St. George’s Cross? Should Germans drop the eagle? Should we all drop the fasces? No, instead we should stand by our myths and symbols because they are ours.
Patriot Front avoids the term “White”.
Hence, the pretzel logic of avoiding the term White to describe European Americans in order to placate conservatives to whom they appeal for help in realising their pro-White-in-all-but-name national renewal.
Firstly, Americans are Europeans. Amending that to say “European Americans” insinuates that there are other types of Americans, and there aren’t — to be an American is to be a European, just like how Australian clearly denotes a European dwelling in Australia. Secondly, Patriot Front members are unabashedly White Nationalists and White advocates. Ranging from lukewarm people like Jared Taylor, to hardcore activists like Rob Rundo, other White Nationalist and White advocates support Patriot Front. In Thomas’s interviews and speeches, he often speaks about the White race in explicit terms. The author is again being duplicitous.
Final Thoughts
The author did write a good article in terms of technical quality, but he misrepresented many things, and clearly doesn’t know what Patriot Front actually does. It is also obvious that he is a third-worldist and has strange ideas about our struggle. He end his article with this:
Securing a future for European nations cannot be, and should not be, achieved unless and until Jewish power has been defeated. National victories can only follow from a global victory — the ultimate victory — against international Zionism. A just European state cannot be built on the bodies of Palestinians who are abandoned to their fate by the so-called new virtuous Americans. Patriot Front would do well to remember that Aryan denotes honour.
Securing a future for Europeans nations should be secured in any way possible, and defeating jewish power is definitely a part of that, but we have many other enemies who are now golems — created by the jew, but not fully controlled by the jew. Muslims extremists, immigrant voting blocks, and liberal radicals are all funded and supported by global jewry, but they are like golems, running amuck and no longer following every command of their erstwhile masters. Also, White Nationalists have been calling out jewish crimes against the Palestinians for decades, but we affirm the fact that Palestinians are not allies. Palestinians in Western nations still commit crimes at a higher rate than native populations. Arabs and Muslims who hate jews are not allies against jews — they are a golem, no more and no less.
The author says that Patriot Front is regressing backwards, not moving forwards, however I would argue that the myopic view many NS people have towards America is regressive. They seek to convince us to abandon the national symbols and myths of our fathers, to embrace Palestinians as brothers in our great racial struggle, and to admit that blacks are just as American as we are — these people are not serious nationalists. They are internationalists of a White variety. They claim to be National Socialists, but they forget the national part in its entirety. Ultimately, they just hate America for our actions in WW2, and would seek to weaken our national resolve because they see it as being tied inextricably to jewish power. Ironic, seeing as how nationalists like Patriot Front have the largest organizations and have real on-the-ground influence.
Lastly, Aryan denotes nobility, kinship, and status as freemen2. Honor is a part of that, certainly, but Aryan comes from the PIE word *heryos and has descendant words in every European language. We colloquially call ourselves Aryans because of the propaganda of the NSDAP, but it would be more accurate to call ourselves aristocrats. We are the aristocratic race descended from freedom loving patriarchs. This is partly why we have concepts such as “the Founding Fathers” in the first place.
At the core of the complaints against Patriot Front, we find a strong anti-Americanism. Many people who hate Patriot Front simply hate them because Patriot Front is unabashedly American, and this is true for both detractors on the left and right. Of course, some paranoid people think Patriot Front are feds, or some sort of pat-con to control the rightwing and get young men arrested, but those people tend to be terminally online folks, or those with little to no experience in dissident politics.
Patriot Front affirms the ethnogenesis that many Europeans went through to create the American nation. They affirm the Founding Stock, the western expansion, and the later European immigrants. They are opposed to Zionism and all the things that entails. They organize large numbers of activists towards common causes, such as working out, job networking, or community service in the face of natural disasters. They influence anti-immigration and pro-heritage organizations. They are doing good work, whether you agree with them or not. The only complaints and criticisms that I think are worthwhile come from the more accelerationist side of our sphere, but their critiques ultimately fall flat because they are not capable of organizing a revolution any better than Patriot Front. They also fall into the same anti-Americanism that plagues the terminally online NS sphere.
Stop hating the American nation just because of WW2. It is gay and childish. Patriot Front represents a side of our movement that every European nation needs to replicate. If every single European nation had a martial, well-organized, peaceful national organization that marched on their capitals every year, and who infiltrated and influenced local right-wing organizations, we might actually get somewhere. If every single White identarian stopped acting like their way is the only way and just got on board with the largest activist groups in their nations, perhaps we might win.
As it stands, too many people are opposed to the idea of a nation. They would rather be perpetual victims in an international struggle against jews than to organize with men of their own nations to oppose mass migration. They would rather LARP as 1940’s Germans than accept that they are modern day Americans, Britons, Australians, etc..
Instead of sniping at the sidelines over the URL, get out and march with your brethren IRL. If you can’t do that, then support your brethren in any way possible.
Dearborn, Maduro, and Nationalism
In this article, I will be addressing late last year’s controversies surrounding Dearborn, Michigan, and the various actions and protests which occurred there, along with touching on some interesting issues between approaches on our side. I will then juxtapose these against each other to see what we might learn about how different right-wingers approach…
Who are the Aryans?
I really don’t want to go into lengthy detail with this, so I will try to keep it short. Besides, I will mostly be expressing my own opinion on the subject, and I am by no means an expert. Most people don’t know what “Aryan” means, and when they google the word, they will assume its either in reference to a subsect of higher caste Indians, or they will …














"third-worldists"
America is a 3rd world country. It is run by jews and it is majority non-White among the young generations. Anti-Americanism is the correct pro-White position. Suspiciously that third-worldist insult is only ever flung at Whites that are criticizing jews.
"right-wing spergs"
You aren't arguing with right wingers. You were arguing with National Socialists. America is a Zionist-Capitalist country. Why should National Socialists support America?
Banning you is the appropriate response to you because you are an account that makes the arguments of a Unit Eight-Two-Hundred jewbot. May Iran bomb your data center.
Great 👍 response. Though, I’m not blocked by TheRightttoDissent. Do you mean being blocked from commenting?