Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James's avatar

I appreciate how you root the idea of virtue in its original etymology—literally “man”—and use that to argue moral excellence is what separates us from “lowly beasts.”

But what really resonates is the idea that virtue is never automatic; it requires choice and conscious practice. True virtue emerges when we strive to be better, not when we yield to base impulses.

I also like how you move beyond standard definitions to highlight the social dimension of virtue. Gaelic cliù, for instance, captures how reputation and communal respect lead towards group cohesion. Combined with the Roman pietas for family and nation, it underscores that virtue is not a solo pursuit but a framework for collective well-being, rooted in shared identity and reciprocity.

Great article.

Expand full comment
Levi of Siluria's avatar

"The investigation of words is the beginning of education". I especially like cliu, which is new to me. I might take issue with the idea that "white men...seek virtue for virtues sake"; I think this misorders the relation. Surely white (European) men are invested with a kind of talent or potential that is particular to them, and which is conducive to the pursuit of virtue, but I think that by its nature virtue, being born of choice, cannot have no direct relation to inheritance. Blood is the condition under which virtue must develop, so can be more or less propitious, but virtue is a spiritual inheritance which divides a race by quality. Would it be better to say that "white men are uniquely invested to seek virtue for virtues sake"? It may also be true that European men are uniquely tasked (by the gods?) to seek virtue for virtues sake, but in either case no inevitable function is supposed- which is why the West is what it is now, and why so many will fall by the wayside.

Good essay.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts