Really good article. There's loads of stories of tall blonde mummies being uncovered all over the States, which were taken to the Smithsonian and then promptly disappeared. I think this ties in to the probable fact that previous civilisations — Aryan in origin — almost certainly existed in the American continent. It also shows just how coopted we were even back in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
From Germany, to Britain and Ireland, ranging all the way to the Americas and New Zealand - we keep finding that red haired giants and little blonde pygmies are mentioned together.
And don't forget all the work they're doing in China to plant forests over ancient pyramids. Bet they were so excited to uncover "there illustrious past" only to keep finding blonde and red headed mummies!
As far as the Kennewick Man question goes, the reason the clovis/kennewick stuff is untrue is pretty simple: We have DNA from these groups now and they were definitely Indians. The reason they look rather Caucasoid probably has to do with their Ancient North Eurasian ancestry, and because the "Mongoloid" phenotype is a lot more recent than people might imagine. Ancient North Eurasians contributed heavily to Native Americans and also to Eastern Hunter Gatherers, who comprise 50% of the genome of the Yamnaya and similar Western Steppe Herders. Ancient North Eurasians are usually modeled to be around 70% Cro-Magnon (particularly the "K-S Clade represented by the Kostenki samples) and around 30% Tianyuan-like -- basically very early East Eurasian. Tianyuan probably didn't have the "mongoloid" phenotype yet. I would think they looked like the Jomon people who lived in Japan, because the Jomon are sort of a non-mongolized non-australoized strain of East Eurasian. It's possible that East Eurasians represent the older clade of Eurasians, and West Eurasians represent some drifted group that took over Europe, and this is why early Paleolithic Europeans have an East Eurasian affinity.
Cro Magnons, by the way, were caucasoid. Black nationalists use bad reconstructions to portray Kostenki as black. Not true.
It is very difficult to tell if things like Solutrean Hypothesis, or the Irish monks, or Romans discovering America are true because modern Native American DNA is rather mixed. So, for example, R1b is a very common haplogroup for Native Americans in Canada, and this would signal European admixture post-bering if it wasn't for the more likely explanation that this came from recent European admixture. Same story with X2 mtDNA.
The only thing I recall about the Irish America theory is that some things that looked like Ogham were found on the east coast of the U.S., but I find it unlikely that Europeans made sustained contact that far south. It is much more plausible to say that Europeans sailed into Labrador, Nova Scotia once in a while on fishing voyages like you were talking about with me earlier.
Thanks for the comment and compliment on the poem, I was hoping you'd see this post. I just don't have the technical knowledge to explain the intricacies of the situation.
I think there could be more evidence of prolonged contact, but I'm really uninterested in proving anything. To me, it's just good propaganda to pretend that it is real, and it will piss off our enemies which is basically what they are doing when they claim some ancient White man is black.
Thanks again, Sectionalism. Ye based incels are the backbone of our race.
Really good article. There's loads of stories of tall blonde mummies being uncovered all over the States, which were taken to the Smithsonian and then promptly disappeared. I think this ties in to the probable fact that previous civilisations — Aryan in origin — almost certainly existed in the American continent. It also shows just how coopted we were even back in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Yeah, it definitely does highlight how our civilization was already being subverted prior to WW2 and modern globalism.
I live about an hour north of Fort Mountain. It's all true IMO.
There's been tons of physical evidence over the years, all of which has been dismissed because it's "racist."
Red Haired Giants
From Germany, to Britain and Ireland, ranging all the way to the Americas and New Zealand - we keep finding that red haired giants and little blonde pygmies are mentioned together.
What a fun mystery, and what a legendary Earth
And don't forget all the work they're doing in China to plant forests over ancient pyramids. Bet they were so excited to uncover "there illustrious past" only to keep finding blonde and red headed mummies!
Don't forget Egypt.
Queen Hashteptsut
Sporting her red blonds hair.
Interesting post. I liked the poem.
As far as the Kennewick Man question goes, the reason the clovis/kennewick stuff is untrue is pretty simple: We have DNA from these groups now and they were definitely Indians. The reason they look rather Caucasoid probably has to do with their Ancient North Eurasian ancestry, and because the "Mongoloid" phenotype is a lot more recent than people might imagine. Ancient North Eurasians contributed heavily to Native Americans and also to Eastern Hunter Gatherers, who comprise 50% of the genome of the Yamnaya and similar Western Steppe Herders. Ancient North Eurasians are usually modeled to be around 70% Cro-Magnon (particularly the "K-S Clade represented by the Kostenki samples) and around 30% Tianyuan-like -- basically very early East Eurasian. Tianyuan probably didn't have the "mongoloid" phenotype yet. I would think they looked like the Jomon people who lived in Japan, because the Jomon are sort of a non-mongolized non-australoized strain of East Eurasian. It's possible that East Eurasians represent the older clade of Eurasians, and West Eurasians represent some drifted group that took over Europe, and this is why early Paleolithic Europeans have an East Eurasian affinity.
Cro Magnons, by the way, were caucasoid. Black nationalists use bad reconstructions to portray Kostenki as black. Not true.
https://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2017/05/kostenki14-morphologically-caucasoid.html
It is very difficult to tell if things like Solutrean Hypothesis, or the Irish monks, or Romans discovering America are true because modern Native American DNA is rather mixed. So, for example, R1b is a very common haplogroup for Native Americans in Canada, and this would signal European admixture post-bering if it wasn't for the more likely explanation that this came from recent European admixture. Same story with X2 mtDNA.
The only thing I recall about the Irish America theory is that some things that looked like Ogham were found on the east coast of the U.S., but I find it unlikely that Europeans made sustained contact that far south. It is much more plausible to say that Europeans sailed into Labrador, Nova Scotia once in a while on fishing voyages like you were talking about with me earlier.
Thanks for the comment and compliment on the poem, I was hoping you'd see this post. I just don't have the technical knowledge to explain the intricacies of the situation.
I think there could be more evidence of prolonged contact, but I'm really uninterested in proving anything. To me, it's just good propaganda to pretend that it is real, and it will piss off our enemies which is basically what they are doing when they claim some ancient White man is black.
Thanks again, Sectionalism. Ye based incels are the backbone of our race.