Modern people are desperately seeking a worldview that can sustain, fulfill, or just plain entertain them. Normies actively bandwagon on different cargo-cults, and they call themselves liberals or conservatives as though they were denoting their entire existence with those silly words. Gays and sex addicts are known to base their entire existence around their degenerate behavior, even going so far as to steal the word “pride” which comes from a root word that basically just means bravery1 - gays think they are being brave by being aberrant. Christians eschew the concept of pride and consider it a sin, choosing to identify with a wider Christendom in self-negation.
The issue here is that political, religious, or social ideologies are not capable of supplying a holistic, wholesome, and robust identity, while nature readily supplies us with an innate genetic identity that has the capacity to create wholesome ideologies - ideologies which are simply accoutrements on the foundational identity.
This is because ideologies are only surrogate identities.
Etymonline gives this for “identity”2:
c. 1600, "sameness, oneness, state of being the same," from French identité (14c.), from Medieval Latin identitatem (nominative identitas) "sameness," ultimately from Latin idem (neuter) "the same" (see idem).
Your identity is the same thing as yourself. This “state of being the same” is our natural state, the very reality we experience from birth until death, and beyond. This is known as the Law of Identity, which is perhaps best encapsulated in this phrase by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: "Everything is what it is,” which just means that each thing is the same as itself.
The concept of racial, ethnic, national, or tribal identity all relates to physical and spiritual states of our experienced reality. You cannot change your race or ethnicity, and you cannot change the fundamental spirit that animates your body. I know that CRISPr babies and other genetic travesties will likely be created in the future (if they aren’t already here) but those difficult philosophical hurdles will have to be dealt with when those abominations are out and about. Currently, is it impossible for people to change their fundamental identity without mutilating and demeaning themselves, which doesn’t actually produce anything new and better, but instead destroys what was already there.
It is possible to change your nation and tribe since these are just groupings of races and ethnicity, but we all know that this requires racial homogeneity between the immigrant and the native, along with full assimilation on the part of the immigrant or else the change will be purely superficial. This is completely shown through the recent third-world implants into the West, or even more famously with jews, for these groups maintain their own internal tribes within our nations. They cannot assimilate based on the simple fact that they do not possess the same identity as those natives who created the nation - they can only change the nation to suit their needs. This is no different than when invasive trees, like the Bradford Pear, take over an entire forest and redirects the ecosystem to their own purposes.
This invasive nature is due to different identities battling for control over a nation. Foreigners commonly partake in what they now call identity politics, which is basically a melding of identity and ideology, where there is no distinction between the person and the things that person believes about themselves. Etymonline goes on to explains how the “black feminist Combahee River Collective” coined the term identity politics:
"[I]dentity politics" [is] a phrase with notably wide currency in gay and lesbian communities. In common usage, the term identity politics refers to the tendency to base one's politics on a sense of personal identity—as gay, as Jewish, as Black, as female ..... [Diana Fuss, "Essentially Speaking," 1989]
This melding of the two (racial and sexual identity with political ideology) may be one of the most terrible things to ever befall mankind. Choosing to masquerade as a woman doesn’t make you a woman, it makes you a tranny. Choosing to call yourself “two-spirit” doesn’t magically make you multiple races with multiple bio-spirits dominating your identity - one of the racial identities will always win in the end. Choosing to be a faggot is not the same as being born a specific race - neither is your religion your tribe, nor does your political party trump your genetic race. Genetics and biology are not things that can be dictated by the words of mankind, not yet at any rate. By ignoring this careful biological distinction, people are able to accept a whole range of foolish notions concerning themselves and their relation to reality. This is how jews conquered the West, by directly subverting and changing our base identities through constant attacks on our political ideologies.
Let us turn to Uncle Ted and the “Industrial Society and Its Future”3 and examine some of the concepts he identified in this arena. He accurately explains the workings of identity politics here:
Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society.
These folks are simply utilizing ideologies as a replacement for their real identity, which they are generally unsatisfied with. Surrogate ideologies are incapable of replacing foundational identities. These surrogates produce the same effect that surrogate activities produce - a weak, ineffectual human with no context, no wisdom, and no power. As Ted Kaczynski explains concerning surrogate activities:
Modern man must satisfy his need for the power process largely through pursuit of the artificial needs created by the advertising and marketing industry, and through surrogate activities.
Let us turn to Uncle Ted and the “Industrial Society and Its Future” to explain further:
A surrogate activity is an activity that is directed toward an artificial goal that the individual pursues for the sake of the “fulfillment” that he gets from pursuing the goal, not because he needs to attain the goal itself. For instance, there is no practical motive for building enormous muscles, hitting a little ball into a hole or acquiring a complete series of postage stamps. Yet many people in our society devote themselves with passion to bodybuilding, golf or stamp-collecting. Some people are more “other-directed” than others, and therefore will more readily attach importance to a surrogate activity simply because the people around them treat it as important or because society tells them it is important. That is why some people get very serious about essentially trivial activities such as sports, or bridge, or chess, or arcane scholarly pursuits, whereas others who are more clear-sighted never see these things as anything but the surrogate activities that they are, and consequently never attach enough importance to them to satisfy their need for the power process in that way.”
The other week I wrote about how Kinism is directly related to your real identity4. Your real identity is directly created by your genetics - by your ancestors, your tribe, your family! I am a MacMillan first, a Western Gael second, an American third, and lastly, I am a simple White man. No one can take this from me - it is my birth right to identify with my ancestry over social and religious ideaologies.
Completely true. I recently came across a study suggesting that someone with mixed-race children is genetically closer to the average stranger in their neighborhood than to their own child. Imagine the psychological shock—your traits, moods, and dispositions aren't truly reflected in your own offspring, not to mention your physical features or even intelligence. For those with an R-selected strategy, the focus is on quantity of offspring, not quality, but even so, many seem utterly oblivious to the deeper implications. Their "identity" has become entirely cosmopolitan, detached from any personal or ancestral continuity..And it’s even more disorienting for the children, who grow up grappling with fragmented identities, often feeling disconnected from any one heritage. This can create deep-seated identity struggles, which is tragic in its own right—an emotional inheritance of uncertainty and confusion, rather than a grounded sense of belonging.
One lesson I have distilled from Sun Tzu is to learn to turn disadvantages into advantages. These degenerate identity politics people prove us right about everything we have always suspected about them. They have no place in our aryan culture. To be aryan means to exhibit a nobility of character. The antonym of noble is ignoble; not honorable in character or purpose. The advantage they are providing us is that they are openly identifying themselves and declaring their immutable enmity towards us and our culture. This fortifies and edifies our position. We must continue to embrace our noble heritage.
Cheers!